How to Fix Our Hospital Pricing Problem (and How Not To)

Guest post by Erin Fuse Brown
[Cross-posted from Center for Law, Health and Society Blog]

Last month, Slate columnist Reihan Salam wrote a provocative article about outrageous hospital prices that are driven, according to Salam, by greed, avarice, and market power. Salam gets a few things dead right, namely his diagnosis that we have a massive hospital pricing problem that is bleeding us dry and that the problem is largely caused by growing hospital market power. However, he misses the mark when laying out policy recommendations to curb monopoly-driven hospital prices.

The solutions

Antitrust:  Salam favors using antitrust enforcement to prevent health care consolidation and to reduce barriers to entry for competition. The biggest problem with antitrust enforcement is that it can do little to reverse or break up existing monopolies. Antitrust laws will be unable to help the vast majority of hospital markets that are already concentrated. Second, even with its improving success rate in court, the FTC simply cannot prevent or police the ongoing wave of hospital mergers, resulting in price increases up to 40% price increases in some areas. To be sure, increased antitrust enforcement is a necessary element of the strategy to control hospital prices to stem the tide of consolidation that is driving prices upward. But antitrust is no silver bullet, especially for hospital markets that have already become noncompetitive.

Market solutions: Market solutions such as price transparency, consumer-directed health care, reference pricing, or narrow networks are popular approaches to control prices among health policymakers. Market solutions to the hospital pricing problem are intuitively pleasing—they attempt to restore market forces to a failed market.  The biggest problem with market approaches is that they fundamentally will not work in concentrated markets where there is little choice or competition between hospitals. This is because all market solutions rely on consumers being able to exert competitive pressure on hospitals, a scenario impossible if there are few choices. Moreover, the stressful nature of most hospital encounters make it unlikely for patients to overcome the substantial cognitive and behavioral barriers to rational consumer-behavior in acute care contexts.

Rate regulation: There are two policy alternatives to counter monopolies: antitrust laws and rate regulation. As noted above, antitrust enforcement has limited force against extant monopolies, so rate regulation is the only hospital pricing solution capable of addressing the problem of provider market power. Rate regulation can take many forms, such as Maryland’s all-payer rate setting system, caps on negotiated prices, or a single payer system like Medicare. A predictable criticism is that rate regulation is inefficient and the regulators are subject to political capture. These concerns point to the importance of institutional design to counteract inefficiency and capture, but they do not let us off the hook from considering rate regulation seriously. The current system of unregulated prices is bloated with enormous administrative costs from the fragmented payer landscape, far exceeding other countries’ single or regulated payment systems. Like it or not, rate regulation may be the only option that has any hope of disciplining outrageous hospital prices in concentrated markets.

The bottom line

The story of our unchecked health care spending in the U.S. is a story about high and undisciplined prices. Our health care pricing problem is driven at its core by a growing provider monopoly problem. For the increasing preponderance of noncompetitive health care provider markets, the only policy capable of addressing the market power of providers is direct rate regulation. Antitrust enforcement cannot restore competition to already concentrated markets and no amount of competitive pressure will create choices for consumers where none exist. For the vast majority of jurisdictions with concentrated provider markets, health care rate regulation must be a central part of any policy strategy to control health care spending.

The Petrie-Flom Center Staff

The Petrie-Flom Center Staff

The Petrie-Flom Center staff often posts updates, announcements, and guests posts on behalf of others.

One thought to “How to Fix Our Hospital Pricing Problem (and How Not To)”

  1. Go to http://www.compassionandchoices.org and search on the Dementia Addendum that may be added to any Advance Directive. It provides guidance to one’s health care agent in the advent of dementia.

    My mother lived to 105 and was in deep dementia for about 8 years. She did not know me and did not understand or respond to anything said to her. She received no meds, had nothing wrong with her accept the frailty of extreme old age. She was the Eveready Bunny and her battery refused to shut down. She received no aid in eating or drinking and no encouragement to do so. She still managed to put enuf into her mouth to survive those years until one night she went to sleep and forgot to take another breath.

    Go to Amazon.com and purchase a book called “Final Exit.” It provides excellent instructions for self-deliverance with helium. Helium is readily available in every Party Store in the balloon kits. I already have a “helium bag” put away in my storage room just in case I want it some day. A California friend of mine did not like the road ahead and self-delivered with the helium method. However, one must be mentally competent to self-deliver.

    VSED: Voluntary Stopping Eating and Drinking is a possible choice only in the end stage of a terminal illness when the body is normally shutting down and not wanting sustenance. Hospice supports the patient who makes this choice. A book by physician Stanley Terman, “A Better Way to Say Goodbye” has an excellent chapter on VSED and the amelioration of discomfort. You may purchase from Amazon.com for about $25 a excellent DVD “Dying Wish”. It is a legacy video made by physician Michael Miller who is dying of pancreatic cancer and decides that VSED is the easiest and most natural way for him to hasten his death. The video is 29-minutes and goes thru his 10-days of VSED to death.

    You might also google Final Exit Network for interesting information. I am a member.

    I hope you will find this information helpful.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.