By John Tingle
PACAC, the House of Commons, (Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee) has just published its analysis of the PHSO’s, (Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman ) second report into the tragic death of Sam Morrish, a three year old child whose death from sepsis was found to have been avoidable. PACAC is composed of MP’s (Members of Parliament) and its remit includes considering matters relating to the quality and standards of administration provided by civil service departments which includes the Department of Health. PACAC also examines the reports of the PHSO.
The PACAC report is very thorough and detailed and really gets to grips with the issues surrounding NHS (National Health Service) health adverse incident investigation. It addresses very clearly the current challenges and opportunities in this area and puts forward some major concerns which need to be fully addressed by the NHS before it can be said to have a listening and learning culture. It is clear from reading the report that the NHS has a very long way to go before it can be said to be even close to reaching its listening and learning culture attainment goal.
The PACAC report also identifies what could be regarded as some muddled thinking by the Department of Health on the concept of the ‘safe space’ in NHS investigations and identifies some important patient safety policy gaps.
The ’Safe Space’ Concept
The concept of the ‘safe space’ features very strongly in the report. The idea is that investigations by the new HSIB (Healthcare Safety Investigation Branch) will operate in a ‘safe space’ .To give the parties to the investigation, what is termed some ’psychological safety’ so that lessons can be learnt freely and a learning culture can begin to flourish without fear of punitive action being taken against them. The report states that it is presently unclear how the HSIB , including its safe space investigations , will interact with existing bodies in the legislative landscape, such as the CQC (Care Quality Commission) or NHS Improvement to secure to secure improvements in the NHS investigatory processes.
The report refers to four key terms that are now commonplace in discussions about the need to improve investigations in the NHS in England: ‘safe space,’ ‘just culture,’ ‘blame culture,’ and ‘learning culture.’ What is needed to achieve a ‘just culture’ and the opportunities and challenges are also discussed. A number of important conclusions and recommendations are made in the report .
The concepts of ‘safe space,’ ‘just culture,’ ‘blame culture,’ and ‘learning culture’are very interesting. The analysis of them in the report is almost philosophical and jurisprudential in tone. What is worrying about this is that if the NHS gets too bogged down in defining terminology and abstract definitions then the battle to develop an ingrained patient safety culture will be lost. If we over confuse or over-engineer the discussion then we are going to obscure the communication of key patient safety messages to all NHS staff at all service levels. There is I feel a real danger of this happening and it is one of the key reasons why the NHS has struggled over the years to develop an ingrained patient safety culture.
Due to its strong research base, the UK produces about nine per cent (9%) of the documents throughout the world and receives about ten per cent (10%) of citations worldwide. Generally, the country is second to the U.S. in terms of volume and also the second after the U.S. among the G8 countries in terms of research quality in most fields, which is a vital factor for foreign students. Moreover, students have also access to the most up to date knowledge and information, and are led by some of the leading professors and research workers in their respective fields.
Well-Written article. It will be supportive to anyone who utilizes it, including me. Keep doing what you are doing – can’t pause to read more posts. Thanks for the precious help.