by Thalia Viveros Uehara and Alicia Ely Yamin
Conclusion of the Digital Symposium Climate Change and Health:
Mobilizing Public International Law into Action
COP29 in Baku underscored what many had feared — a summit defined by missed opportunities. Perhaps this was to be expected, given that it was the second COP in a row held in a petro-state, with more fossil fuel lobbyists in attendance than climate and environmental activists. The pitiful outcome of $300 billion pledged (by 2035) felt more like an insult than a compromise, particularly when compared to Africa’s $163 billion annual expenditure on debt servicing.
But the disappointment surrounding financing outcomes was merely a symptom of deeper power imbalances, what critical legal scholar Martti Koskenniemi describes as the “structural biases” of global governance institutions. COP29 marked yet another shift in the fragile equilibrium of the underlying logic of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), steering it further toward the ultimate commodification of climate action. What does this mean for the “health turn” that the UNFCCC has recently begun to witness?